From the project Pattern and Rhythm
Was there ever a better photographic smell than opening one of those aluminum 35-millimeter film cans with a 36 exposure roll of Kodachrome inside? That’s just a random thought that struck me today. Analog photography was certainly an aromatic process. Besides fresh film, printing paper had its own aroma. On the other hand, sometimes the smells weren’t all that great. Stop Bath was just really concentrated vinegar. Even the “no smell” fixer stunk up the entire house, no matter where your darkroom was located or how well it was vented. A bunch of scrubbing was required to get that horrible odor off your hands, too. The rotten egg smell of sepia toning was so bad it was always a job done outdoors. Come to think of it, the bad smells outnumbered the good ones by a wide margin. As Brooks Jensen once opined, “Photographic desirability is directly proportional to the offensiveness of the smell and cost of the chemical.”
In comparison, digital photography is absolutely sterile. I feel kind of cheated because while I am spending a bunch of money on supplies, how can I tell if they are any good if they don’t smell up the house?
At least my wife is happy because the aroma of Sunday dinner doesn’t have to compete with darkroom chemicals.